A case study of a new sprout growing from a text that was dead due to social triggers.

Philosophy not to [Warehouse of dead texts

But if the dead text is still sedimented with an old update date and time, there's no real harm done.

Get a hit on your search.

This is an old experiment

Here is what actually took place in this project

Actual connections between "living topics" and past "dead texts" were discovered.

What should happen at this time

It's not good to have pages that don't have a proper title appear in the top updated list.

Depends on whether you can give it an appropriate title.

If you can attach it, we can make it a living page.

A search for this keyword yielded two blog posts.

I copied the necessary parts and created a new page.

I noticed it later.

Secure Override Operation

When you update the script and convert it back, it's sad when you overwrite it and lose the human-written text.

This anxiety prevents us from "keeping it updated".

Don't change the machine-generated page, just create a page with a good title that can be duplicated when you want to change it.

I originally assumed that this imported stuff would not be edited, I forgot.

Thanks to the fact that it was a machine-generated "page with no proper title," it avoided editing itself.

You titled this page "A case study of a socially triggered dead text brought back to life," which is incorrect.

I thought the dead text was not brought back to life?

The dead text is given a plain title "It is a dead text," thereby preventing direct human editing

Scrapbox doesn't have such a feature, but I'd rather it be uneditable.

The dead text gave birth to a child.

Dead fish don't have babies.

Changed the title to "A Case Study of New Sprouts Growing from a Socially Triggered Dead Text".

Books are dead text

The seeds in it can take root and sprout in the fields of the reader's heart.

Dead texts are not brought back to life.

Some people chop up dead texts and put them on a shelf, that's not budging.

---